The condition
of paranoia is one in which meaning is attributed to arbitrary occurrences,
disparate elements are tied conspiratorially together, and patterns are
superimposed onto chaos. This is a state that is somewhat intrinsic to the way
in which the human psyche works. Meaning is generally understood to be
ephemeral; it is not something that has inherent existence in any one thing or
another. Rather it is imposed, a matter of interpretation. The mind has always
had a tendency to contextualize all signals. Chaos is not permitted in the
human psyche. The soul deprived of meaning simply creates meaning of its own; this
is true in both for the artist and the paranoiac, and no less for the most
vulgar among us.
Literature
bears much in common with mental illness. The reader is compelled to draw
connections between disparate events and feelings, to become convinced that a
higher order exists within the variety of the narrative, and to seek some grand
solution to the matter. Perhaps the reader, while immersed in the story, even
feels that they are just on the verge of grasping that solution. Kidd explains as
much during his psychiatric evaluation with Madame Brown as he glances uneasily
at the scar on her leg, noting again the chain she bears as he fingers his own.
“When I was in the hospital - “
remembering, I smiled – “I used to have a friend who’d say: ‘When you’re
paranoid, everything makes sense.’ But that’s not quite it. It’s that all sorts
of things you know don’t
relate suddenly have the air of things
that do. Everything you look at seems
just an inch away from its place in a perfectly clear pattern.”
The very
motifs that appear in both narrative and in mental illness are also present in
the initiatory ordeal. In fact, the whole of the book might be considered as an
extended initiation in which Kidd plays the parts of both initiate and
Hierophant. Kidd’s quest for the Lost Word may be taken also as the journey to
adulthood, roughly taking the form of the Ouroboros in much the same way as
does Finnegan’s Wake.
On the other
hand, perhaps it’s all just meaningless after all. Delany certainly seems to
take his pleasure in walking the knife edge between meaning and chaos. We are
presented, within the depths of the final chapter, with a string of nonsense
phrases from Kidd’s journal. About halfway through the journal entry in
question we find the phrase, “I have come to wound the autumnal city”,
suggesting that all of the meaning which we have attributed to this cryptic
proclamation may be mistaken, that the phrase is simply the result of
free-association after all, as meaningless as any of the epithets which
surround it (“Pavement sausages split; the cabbage remembers. […] Fondle my
noodle, love my dog. […] Pentacle pie in hunger city…”)
Several
among the artists of the avant-garde over the last century (the anathematized) have
attempted to escape the bounds of the narrative art. Some have attempted to
capture the dizzying chaos of life, while others have striven to reach beyond
all that we know and all that we are. While the avant-garde has often succeeded
at providing a change in perspective for the reader or viewer, it has never
quite managed to destroy the classical techniques against which it has striven.
It has failed to wound the autumnal city. The human psyche cannot escape its
own context, its own tendency to endow all that it encounters with meaning, to
tie the sensory data that is presented to it into some sort of pattern. Our experience
is all bound up with the process of interpretation, leaving us powerless to
perceive the naked truth of the matter. The truth is that we do not perceive the
world directly, but rather through a series of mirrors, prisms and lenses of
our own making.
Within
the space of seven rambling chapters, making liberal use of great beauty and
banality, explicit sex and violence, long drifts of unnavigable ruin amidst the
shifting streets of a hostile city, Delany has shown us, by way of example, a
ubiquitous governing principal which regulates all signals, and to which we are
inextricably bound. It is up to us to decide whether we wish to hide behind
this principal, to use it as a weapon, or wield it as a tool, whether we wish
to take our place in the endless narrative as victim, oppressor, or initiate.
“Pray
with me! Pray! Pray that this city is the one, pure, logical space from which,
without being a poet or a god, we can all actually leave if – what?”
Hi, Damian,
ReplyDeleteI am going through Dhalgren again (for the 4th time) and quite appreciated and enjoyed your writings here.
If you're still interested, some themes become quite clear and enhanced when listening to the audio version (read by S. Rudnicki). Turns of phrase, rhymes and repeating pieces ring like memories, a new lens by which to fall into this world.
Cheers, Roger
Hi roger,
ReplyDeleteVery nice to see a reader returning to the analysis for more than one read. It would be interesting to hear the book read aloud, definitely - some of George's monologues especially. I'm reminded of a brief reading Joyce once did of a section of Finnegan's Wake. In his voice, it all came together perfectly and was more or less understandable.
My best,
Damian
this particular take on the ending of the book reminds me, quite aptly, of this article regarding ancient, pre-western, pre-vedic tantrik studies of Sanskrit texts, some of the oldest spiritual writings in the world, through somewhat of a Buddhist lens (or prism, or mirror), that of a "near-enemy of truth," takes an interestingly similar stance towards circumstances while expounding, eventually, on the path of the initiate. Very interesting blog: https://hareesh.org/blog/2019/8/30/near-enemy-11-you-can-choose-how-to-respond
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comments and the link! It's good to see that there are people reading this essay.
ReplyDelete